ZONING
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes-----21 November 2007
PRESENT: M.
Mansouri,
Note: These minutes are unapproved and will be
reviewed on 19 December 2007 for errors, omissions and corrections.
The meeting was called to order
at 7:30 pm.
New Business:
Purchase of Yellow Freight.
Ms. Mansouri reported that she had an inquiry from Phillip
Bailey from Acero, which is purchasing the Yellow
Freight depot in the industrial park.
She asked him to come in and let us know what their plans are. She also told him that Acero
would need to contact the Planning Board about site plan approval if
improvements to the property were in excess of $10,000.
Fitz
Vogt,
Cindy Westover for Great Brook Farm--Sign Replacement. Ms. Westover said that their milk house has been renovated and will be
opening as a farm store. Initially, the
store will sell raw milk from the farm in glass bottles. They may sell beef and pork in the near
future. An existing 2’ by 3’ sign on the
milk house is being replaced. Ms.
Westover submitted four possible designs for the new sign and said the family
will be voting on the final plan this week.
All four designs were of the same size, shape, and general design, with
some variation in the graphics. All the designs are the same size as the
existing sign. Ms. Weber moved approval of the sign replacement with the
applicant’s choice of the proposed designs.
Ms. Lester seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously. Ms. Westover advised that the opening of the
farm store will be in the first week of December, and all are invited.
Old Business:
Chamberlain
Machine, Special Exception, Map 14. Lot 4, Former Hubbard Farms property, west
side of Route 12—Request for Rehearing.
Ms. Mansouri stated that Attorney Rebecca Todd has filed a
Request for Rehearing on behalf of John Hansel, Clancy Houghton, Drs. Jennifer
and Peter Palmiotto, and Delores and
Minutes: Approval of the minutes of the
October 19th as
written was moved, seconded and voted unanimously.
Gravel
Pit Application Fees: The Earth
Extractio0n Permit Application fees were not changed when the Board raised its
application fees from $35.00 to $75.00 the Board decided unanimously to bring
the Earth Extraction Permit fees into line with it5a other application
fees and raised them to $75.00.
Proposed
Changes to Zoning Ordinance: The
Zoning Board reviewed the memo and proposed changes sent to the ZBA with a memo
dated November 14, 2007, from Pamela Aslinger,
Secretary to the Planning Board. The Board took the following positions, and
directed Ms. Weber to copy these minutes in the form of a memo to be circulated
directly to Ms. Aslinger and the Planning Board.
1.
Article VIII Rural Agricultural District, Uses
Permitted. This provision would allow
home businesses in the Rural/Agricultural District to the same extent they are
allowed in the Residential and Commercial Districts. The ZBA strongly urges the adoption of this
change, which was initially proposed by the ZBA. We are seeing increasing requests for home
businesses in the RA District. Currently
these businesses must seek and obtain a variance. The Board is concerned that it is a stretch
under current zoning law for the applicants to meet the hardship criterion for
a variance. Technically, everyone in the
RA District who works from home via computer may currently be violating the
Zoning Ordinance. Given the changing
nature of the RA district, and the increasing tendency of people to work from
home or to work several jobs, maintaining the distinction for the RA District
makes no sense to the ZBA.
2.
Article
VIII. Allowance of home businesses in the RA District by Special
Exception. The ZBA sees no reason to
require residents of the RA District to incur more expense and time delays to
work at home than residents of the other districts. Houses are generally farther apart in the RA
District, so the items that would be reviewed, eg. noise of car doors slamming, traffic from clients, etc.
would have less impact on the neighbors than they do currently in the
Residential and Commercial Districts. A footnote
to this proposal suggests restricting home businesses specifically to those
listed currently. The ZBA thinks this is
short-sighted, given that many more persons who work at home today are occupied
with computer sales or other e-commerce, which has no effect on neighbors at
all, but which is not allowed specifically by the proposed language, than are
occupied in the trade of dress-making which is not as common as it was when the
original ordinance was drafted. Again,
the ZBA position is that there is no reason to treat residents of this district
differently than residents of other Districts.
The ZBA would, however, support this measure as being better than no
change at all.
3.
Clarification
that commercial earth excavations must have a special exception in addition to
an earth Excavation Permit. This
provision makes the ZBAs current position on the necessity for both permits
more explicit in the ordinance. The ZBA
supports this change.
4.-6. If the ZBA properly
understands the purpose of these measures, the three measures would make
reference to the Well Source Protection Ordinance, the Telecommunications
Facilities Ordinance, and the Retirement Overlay District, to make sure that
applicants do not overlook these issues when applicable. While the Board has no
objection to the inclusion of these references in the Zoning Ordinance, it was
the position of the ZBA that such inclusion is unnecessary, and that the
inclusion of too many proposals would be likely to result in the passage of
none of them. Projects are reviewed by
the Planning Board, the ZBA or both upon the initial application. Both Boards have experienced members who
alert applicants to the other issues raised by their application.
7. Addition of the words “Class
V or better” to the definition of
8. Commercial District Land
Standards—maintenance of 30% undeveloped open space.
There was some discussion among Board members that this provision might
create some real hardship for the owners of the smaller commercial lots in
town. The ZBA decided that this
provision, like #7, is a policy matter to be determined by the Planning Board and
the ZBA takes no position on the proposal.
9. Well Source Protection
Ordinance Revision. It was somewhat
unclear to ZBA members from a reading of the Well Source Ordinance, the
proposed language, and the explanation provided exactly what the purpose or
effect of this language would be. In any
case, it was the position of the ZBA that if proposal has to do solely with
Planning Board procedures with respect to the Well Source Ordinance, that the
ZBA should take no position on the proposal.
Items 10-13 for
discussion are policy matters which are the province of the Planning Board.
Item 15—Limiting the number of amendments to prevent
overwhelming the voters. The ZBA
strongly agreed with this sentiment.
All ZBA members were
urged to attend the Public Hearing scheduled for December 11, 20078.
Appointment of voting member and alternate. Ms. Mansouri reminded the Board that when Ms. Weber resigns,
someone must be appointed to fill her slot until the next election. She asked the current alternates to consider
who might wish to be appointed and if either of them would seek the seat at the
next election. She then introduced Peggy
Pshirrer of
Upcoming Training: Information on an upcoming
Secretarial Position: Ms. Mansouri handed out job description materials for
consideration by the Board members in deciding a replacement for Ms. Weber as
Secretary.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10
PM.
The next regular meeting will be held on
Wednesday, 19 December at 7:30 PM at the Town Hall.
A SPECIAL MEETING TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO
GRANT A REHEARING ON THE CHAMBERLAIN MACHINE SPECIAL EXCEPTION WILL BE HELD
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, AT 7:30 PM AT THE TOWN HALL.
Respectfully
submitted,
Lucy Weber,
Secretary.